How to expose an historically homophobic area for using it as cover for their 'culture'

1. I was dismissed for Bringing the Companies Name into Disrepute, when the evidence has proven that I was stopping the companies name from falling into disrepute, following the actions of The Operations Manager, and the inaction of The Manager.                                      

⦁ I informed fellow staff members of incidents that management were for at least two years condoning, and then facilitating teenagers' obscene behaviour. That of a girl and boy from the ages of at least twelve and fifteen, to 'wait at the hotel for a lift home after school', who've left evidence many times in the disabled toilets that they'd had sex. The boy of which has then gone on to threaten me twice when challenged, and smashed a window with his beer can, which is when I called the police in. 

⦁ The manager though has said she "wouldn't go through it with me", after hearing about the incident, and still had nothing to say to me after I'd informed staff of my concerns.  

All she could do is ask me to sign a memo, which essentially said don't publicly post critical and disrespectful information.  

⦁ However, this is about managers who are condoning and facilitating underage sex in public places, who lie about police verified evidence, and who sneer at you for getting involved; despite having the authority to do something about a situation where I've been threatened twice. 

⦁ The Manager was on holiday both times the boy threatened me, though I wrote a report about the first occurrence in the incident book (which I believe is her duty to view it), and both other managers were present for the first threat, so I don't believe her claim 'that she didn't know about the threats'.   

⦁ Whilst the Operations Manager would have told her about the second incident, so she could have been told literally anything about it, which could explain why the only thing she has said to me about it is; 

⦁ "Always have to get involved, don't you" 

⦁ then just sneered and walked away. 

⦁ She knew though from reading my post all about the threats, police involvement, the operations manager’s facilitation, and that I'd told people she was at best condoning everything. 

⦁ Hence, she also knew that the operations manager, who she had put in charge of this saga was acting complicitly by secretly overriding the relief manager's and myself barring of the youngsters. Whose activities were common knowledge, whilst I'd also informed her in 2018, which was after the previous manager had told her before he left. 

⦁ Hence, through the operations manager letting them back into the hotel it gave the boy mixed messages, which caused him to threaten me, as the boy said to me, 

⦁ "he knew the owners of the hotel and that he was allowed in here..." .  

(The boy probably thought this man was the owner though, as the operations manager told police his full name after he'd said he met with the boy's mother and agreed to unbar him. Though he now denies police involvement, and hence what he said to them, so he's covering up everything for some reason; and therefore, bringing the owner of …..   Hotels Ltd into this, as the boy (at age 17/18) said,  "He knew the owners". 

         

⦁ Yet still the manager couldn't address the situation with me, thus still leaving no plan on what to do if the couple came back to the hotel again. 

⦁ This confirmed my absolutely zero lack of confidence in her ability as manager to be able, or willing to deal with any situation, never mind do anything about an extremely aggressive, homophobic regressive anger outburst that I was the subject of and witnessed. 

⦁ It did inspire me though to add the satirical final line to my already written second post, as just writing facts in the first one hadn't resulted in the issues and threats being addressed. 

⦁ Therefore if the manager had wanted to talk about the issues I raised, rather than continue to condone it, it would have given me the trust in her to inform her of the homophobic regressive anger outburst I was subjected to. Hence, I wouldn't have needed to have sent the second message later that day which resulted in me being dismissed. 

  

⦁  

⦁ 2. I sent my second informative message privately in the same way as I had the first. This time though I literally had no other choice after my first message was condoned, but to retort with a satirical conclusion to try and ensure an extremely menacing outburst by the F&B Manager got addressed to stop his threatening behaviour.  

⦁ He's a much stronger man than me, and I thought he'd have another regressive anger attack if I approached him about it, just like he did with a Barmaid after she kept 'nagging' him to put Xmas antlers on.  

⦁ I thought the satire would make it far easier for his colleagues to approach him about it, which they did, and now he’s at least aware of his issues. Whereas when I questioned him about it straight after his transformative outburst, he just shook his head, and walked off 'with his tail between his legs'. With the whole scene being only comparable to watching The American Werewolf in London, in 3 seconds! That of a respectable looking young man, who turns into a monster when triggered, and then 'when the light of day hits' he shuffles away like he's naked and innocent due to not remembering what he's just done.  

⦁ However, I was dismissed for harassment and bullying for posting this despite it being myself who had been the subject of and witnessed this horrific regressive anger outburst.  Therefore, I was the actual victim of harassment and bullying by the H.O.D, not him.  

⦁ To be found guilty of harassment and bullying 'the victim' has to be affected by what's happened, which he wasn't as he was just, 

⦁ "Disgusted by my conduct" 

⦁ When he's the one whose conduct is disgusting, as besides the 'attack', he's got a like for paedophilic material on Facebook!! 

⦁ Which on finding this added to my infuriation with ….    Hotel Ltd for doing absolutely nothing to prove my good intentions, and this man's guilt.  

⦁ Therefore a 'so-called' heterosexual, and a member of his staff have been believed without question, despite the latter's story being infeasible, and the former not remembering anything.                     

Therefore, as a pansexual man I've been treated unequally, and with no respect throughout this investigation. 

⦁ I've had to get counselling from Victim Support due to the incident, and anger management help recommended by my doctor, to deal with the aftermath of the regressive anger outburst, and not being believed. 

⦁ The CCTV evidence being washed away by …..    Hotels Ltd didn't help my situation or feelings. Past events and emotions were triggered to make my anger issues need the doctors help after I was left to investigate this man by myself, and discovered he liked watching “obscene behaviour by 13-year-old girls in public”. 

⦁ Initially therefore I thought the regressive anger homophobic outburst was solely due to my pansexuality, however, after looking in his Facebook 'likes' section, it’s clear his rage with me is due to me stopping what he ‘likes’ happening in the hotel’s public toilets. 

  

⦁  

⦁ 3. The HR Manager, who dismissed me called all my 25 witnesses for the disrepute charge a "deflection" from the bullying and harassment charge and so didn't interview any of them! 

⦁ Interviewing them would have revealed my concerns were common knowledge, and management weren't doing anything about it except for allowing teenagers back into the hotel after being barred by myself and the companies main Relief Manager, who wasn't interviewed despite management denying they were barred in first place.   

⦁ This included the operations manager, who when interviewed by HR for the grievance I put in against him has totally contradicted police verified evidence. He's also made a story up to make me look guilty, when he's guilty of covering up what he told the police, police involvement, and two years of whatever the alcohol drinking, used condom leaving youngsters were doing in the disabled toilets. 

⦁ Therefore if HR had interviewed these people for my Disrepute Charge, it would have totally altered the dynamics of the investigation, as the managers have proven their guilt, when interviewed for the grievances I put in against them. 

⦁ This would of lead to the two managers being 'disciplined', and myself being exonerated; as I haven't made "unfounded allegations against the company effectively turning a blind eye towards illegal activities".  

⦁ This would of lead to my bullying and harassment charge having a considerably better chance of being investigated, which it hasn't been; except by people who are desperate to get rid of me to keep me from blowing the whistle again on …...   Hotels Ltd Managers! 

  

⦁  

⦁  

4. The Manager has been aware of this ongoing situation since the previous manager told everyone about them in 2017 being barred from another hotel, she has however given her operations managers version of events her full support despite evidence that 100% contradicts it.   

⦁ She also said:     

⦁ "I didn't tell her the boy had threatened me", even after telling HR in the grievance I put in against her,  

⦁ "she wouldn't go through it with me"                                                                                                 

So how was I supposed to communicate with her about it especially after the only thing she has said to me about the incident after she got back from her holidays was (with a sneer), 

⦁ "Always have to get involved, don't you"  

Which doesn't instil confidence to tell her about what the manager on duty should have told her about what happened, and what had been discussed with the police - which her understudy has now denied everything about the two hours we spent with the police!  

⦁ and that:  

⦁ "I'd no need to get involved" 

(So, why was I the main person in the daytime 'called' to deal with numerous incidents? was there any plan that anyone knew about or were they just to be left alone?! 

⦁  

⦁ The HR department at …..     Hotels Ltd were told she couldn't manage her staff after she condoned her Housekeeper, who before her very eyes acted out threatening to kill and kick a maid’s head in, whilst banging her fists against the wall and tables.         

Since then, she has also condoned a 17-year-old girl being bullied about her weight, liked a joke about fat girls being ugly on Facebook, and has herself been abusive to a teenage girl staff member. Whilst in this case she has not made any effort to prove the barmaid and myself are the victims here!  

⦁ She hasn't looked at the CCTV so not taken any recordings of the bullying incident with the circumstantial evidence they denied, despite saying she would in the Investigative Hearing  

⦁ This is 35 days after the incident, and so well within the CCTV time availability of at least 42 days that HR have confirmed that they viewed another incident after. 

⦁ HR also states, 

⦁ "there is no volume or voice recording on the CCTV to clarify what was said", from at least 57 days after the incident; though there will be circumstantial evidence that proves my version of events and disproves the barmaids; therefore, I hope she's saved a copy of what she has viewed for the Tribunal. 

⦁  

  

⦁  

⦁ 5. HR have compared my gay satire's impact on the attacker several times to myself being raped and beaten up!

This has absolutely sickened me; to the extent of feeling like my whole life's been gaslighted so they can get away with doing whatever they want!

In my view it's also homophobic, as I told her my sexuality was due to issues that stemmed from the sexual abuse I was subjected to as a child (yearning for similarities to the comfort that helped you at the time, which in my case was a cheeky chappy man lol), so she is another staff member who is dehumanising homosexuality hilarity to cover for their underage illegal interests!

I also told her this man showed clear signs like that of an ex friend who had physically attacked me when coming out to them in the past, that indicated he had serious issues that need addressing, as latest research shows 70% of homophobes are also latent homosexuals.  

So, he needs help for his own sake and other peoples!  

  

⦁  

⦁ 6. The only witness for my harassment and bullying charge, the barmaid now says     

    "It did happen but wasn't as bad as I said it was".                                               

She had not said a word about the incident outside the …......... room before this, but had told investigators a much less serious occurrence had happened in the ........., where he referred to me as,  

⦁    "That way inclined" (outing me)               

Despite her claim that I walked in when they were talking about me, I can confirm that I wasn't present for this interaction and the CCTV would have proven that!  

She is either suffering from repressed anger or trying to dumb it down in the hope perhaps that me and him were just given a talking to about the incident. 

⦁She has also refused to speak to police about the incident, despite phoning them up to tell them “She was too busy to get involved in all this”.  

Her telephone interview  about this incident with HR though took just three minutes, whereas with the police it would probably take the same time as the phone call she made to them (as the incident only lasted 3-5 seconds), but there's a high chance she'll have a different story to tell the police than the investigators, just like the operations manager has done. 

  

⦁  

⦁ 7. In response to the respondent's defence, the memo confirmed …...       Hotels Ltd didn't want anyone to use Group Chat to inform people of the extent to which they are willing to cover up their chosen managers indiscretions, and inability to do their jobs. 

     I never had any intention to use Group Chat for my second message though, as the issues raised are best to be dealt with initially by experienced people like me, responsible management (so no one at The Hotel), colleagues, friends of the people involved and the police. 

⦁ The issues of the first message therefore could not be addressed by management as they were all true, which left me with still having to deal with the worry of threats from a youth for stopping them going into the disabled toilets together. 

⦁   I therefore sent the second message in the same private way, and gave it some humour after the first one was ignored, in order to get people I sent it to be involved in 'helping him' for everyone's health, wellbeing and safety; rather than just accept being bullied and harassed due to my sexuality. 

⦁ Regarding what ….HR calls 'inconsistent reasons for justifying sending the messages'; If he's read the messages, I don't think my reasons could have been much clearer in both about why I sent them, and after the hearings its being proven that …..     Hotels Ltd managers will even go to the extent of trying to cover up police involvement.  

⦁ Therefore I was fully justified in sending these messages to shine the light on one mans 'severe issues of a sexual nature, and whatever the extent is of what the managers are covering up; which their chief investigator calls 'mentioning the hotel and it's not in a positive light. 

⦁ Whilst it's true that I didn’t start this, and I have done my best to finish it by getting people to approach him about his issues to help him to address his regressive anger homophobic outbursts. I never said I was helping him reveal his sexuality though, I told HR I was helping him to stop having homophobic regressive anger outbursts through dealing with his issues, that in turn helped everyone else out, by him not being a danger to them. 

⦁ If I'd have just told everyone they would probably of just ignored him, and so the issue wouldn't have been addressed and been left to fester; along with his 'liking' of an obscene video of a 13-year-old girl, until I told the police about it. 

⦁ Therefore it's come to light he isn't just homophobic or a latent homosexual, he has severe sexual issues too, and without my input none of them would be on their way to being resolved! 

⦁ Regarding what I would have done differently in hindsight, I said,  

⦁ 'I would have reported it to the manager under normal managerial conditions',  

⦁ which they couldn't be further from at The Hotel. It's even written in the Disciplinary Hearing that I said "The Manager is not fit to be approached, even besides this incident; so I didn't say “I would have reported it” to this manager.  

⦁ Therefore along with virtually everything else ….HR has put in the Defence of ….    Hotels Ltd due to HR’s desire to deflect attention away from the disrepute charge, he's only using gaslighted facts. 

⦁ He continues this dumbing down / gaslighting of the facts narrative when he states that the regressive anger attacker just 'called me a name', when the truth is as I've written extensively about and demonstrated to all the investigators and the police that it was an extremely aggressive, homophobic regressive anger outburst. 

⦁ ⦁ Furthermore my reasons for not informing management immediately have been justified, as they have failed to investigate the incident , despite CCTV being viewed at Head Office after a lot longer time period. Whilst they also didn't investigate the incident in 2018 or do anything about a child couple having sex in the disabled toilets.  

⦁ All of which would be still festering, if I hadn't of used gay themed satire in my conclusion to draw attention to these incidents that management were brushing under The Hotel's extremely bumpy carpet. 

⦁  

⦁ In conclusion, ….    Hotels Ltd have dismissed the only person at The Hotel who makes the management accountable for their actions and inaction. They've took no action regarding complaints I've made, but as soon as someone has put in a complaint about me, they've pulled out all the stops to dismiss me. 

⦁ Some people may consider my honest and satirical way of dealings with these issues to have been crude; but in context to what I’ve helped expose and reveal, I think I've written one of the greatest concluding lines of satire of all time.  

⦁ As we now know the extent to which ….      Hotels Ltd will go to, to cover up incidents; whilst the attacker and the police are now aware of his issues due to me using his Achillies Heel subject of homosexuality.