Things you need to deal with to become the world record holder for reporting the vile abuse of the vulnerable and animals.
After meeting and promoting a vile deviant and his farm that was also harboring a serial animal torturer and disease spreader!
Pe C was said to be in a confused state of elation, yet disgust today after being informed about the full extent of the depravity that has occurred at a farm he promoted in his book; after meeting and shaking the hand of the owner and chief deviant Mr W.
His elation is said to stem from his hope that he'll never be .... now, as it had been worrying him sick in recent years, whilst feelings of disgust brought him back down to earth as he'd probably exchanged more then just greetings with the bodily fluid 'of an any species' loving owner!
Meanwhile the vivisection trained, convicted serial animal torturing and bTB spreading R....... vet that Mr W employed, appeal against his lenient sentence on the grounds that;
"If the government can appeal against Bankers not getting their bonuses then he can appeal about being banned from working with animals"
This rant came after being found guilty of disgraceful conduct for being responsible for the national spread of bTB, and being allowed to continue working with animals for nearly three years while his veterinary disciplinary hearing was heard; allowing him to add his shocking animal torturing history.
In May ..... Mr D.... //////// attempted to calve a cow that's calf got 'stuck' half way, he then inexplicably tied a rope around the calf's body and attached the other end to a tractor, the operator of which he then ordered to reverse!
This resulted in the rope tightening - ripping the calf's body in half - leaving the head end inside the body of the cow, which had to be euthanized by a UK trained vet who was called out by the owner of the farm when the R......... informed him of what he had done.
The law clearly states that a cow can only be calved with the pulling power equivalent to the average of two men, hence, rules were clearly violated; along with ropes not being tied around the calf's hock's or being tied so they couldn't be tightened any further!
Whilst procedures and rules were also not adhered to by the R.......... when he wrongly tested cattle on four farms in the South, allowing infected cattle to spread the disease nationwide, besides passing it on to badgers (who are now being culled for this!) and other wildlife that infected cattle come into contact with, and allowing bTB infected meat to go in to the food chain on an unprecedented level.
Unbelievably the R........ came to work as a vet after being given an honorary UK veterinary license by E University after he undertook vivisection work for them after attending a veterinary course in C, R..........
His love of experimenting, torturing and killing of animals intensified though when he was employed on the 'High Welfare' classed, ............. ....... ///////// - a farm Pe C devoted several pages to in his book ironically entitled 'H' after meeting with the owner Mr W.
In 2010 he closed the opening of a sheep's vagina that was giving birth at ..... ....... ........ ......s by stitching it together, resulting in the sheep and her unborn lambs death!
His excuse for this being "I thought the sheep was prolapsing"! according to the farms manager A....... ///// and now assistant manager R........ ............, besides farm worker ........ ........... who left the farm because of the incident but didn't actually report it.
A year later he had his whole arm in a cow's .... for an unknown reason! an action that resulted in him killing the cow instantly through damaging it's spinal cord according to the same sources, who didn't report any of the incidents.
Further questions therefore have to be asked about the people who witnessed these crime's or were in managerial positions and aware of such incidents occurring but didn't report them - those in question for the killing of the cow and calf are 1 2 3 4 5 (besides several other foreign nationals)..
!
Whilst Mr Ws partner .... ...... screeched on hearing the news that the cow and calf's death would be investigated:
"It's only a cow, I don't know what all the fuss is about"!
So where the High Welfare status fits in to this farms classification is nowhere to be seen!
Even more questions have to be asked about the High Welfare Farm owners continued support for the R........, as they house and employ him still despite his five year ban on working with animals and him having to pay them compensation for the loss of the cow.
Locals say the couple are open about their s...ger lifestyle and set up the website ..... ‘’’’’’’’ s.........s', though there is no mention or pictures etc of them on the site.
We can only assume therefore that the reason Mr C is still employed part time and housed there (despite numerous farm workers being sacked for complaining to Mr W about Mr C's lack of animal husbandry skills ie J,,,,n who now runs a smallholding in C...........e is due to what one local referred to as 'Tarmacing' the act of de ....cating on people and then rubbing it all over each other.
A claim not exactly too far fetched when you consider Mr W's mantra, which he tells everyone who works on the farm:
"He'll try anything once, except in....t and dancing"!
Another concerning part about this is the site of Mr C riding around in freezing temperatures on an electric buggy late at night on several occasions by several people, dressed only in a pair of lycra underpants carrying lambs towards the owners house
- let's just hope there are innocent reasons for this as his 'office' was behind the owners house, or at worst the lambs were 'only' used to clean themselves off afterwards!
What are the issues or questions for the Tribunal to decide?.
1. Have B' Hotels Ltd tried to thwart my attempts to get 'help' for Mr T's regressive anger, homophobia, and now 'liking' of paedophilic material on Facebook, to stop me blowing the whistle on them again?
As they've used every trick in the book to do this, from not viewing the CCTV despite it being available, believing the only witnesses statement despite it being infeasible, and presuming he's innocent despite him not remembering 'outing' me, or homophobically harassing me in an extremely threatening way.
2. Have B' Hotels then unfairly dismissed me for Harassment and Bullying? After I used my only available outlet of very camp, and gay themed satire in my conclusion to the post I sent to all staff. Where I informed them of what I witnessed, and that I was the subject of an horrendous regressive anger homophobic outburst.
3. Has B' Hotels Ltd also unfairly dismissed me for Bringing The Company into Disrepute?
After informing people that The Hotels Managers have for two years been condoning and facilitating a child couple to have sex in the disabled toilets; besides condoning the boy threatening me twice for barring them. The manager has even gone as far as condoning this issue even after she knew staff had been told about the extent of the condoning; as it was true!
Furthermore, if Mrs G had discussed the issue with me I wouldn't have had to send my second message as I would have had confidence in them to deal with it. Therefore continued condoning of incidents left me still vulnerable to continued threats and homophobia.
4. To ensure I was dismissed, has the Investigator, Mrs K, not interviewed any of my witnesses for my Disrepute Charge in order to protect the Operations Manager? Who has lied about police verified evidence, which would have resulted in him being dismissed and myself being thanked for exposing the truth!
As the truth here would have then given me the continued respectable reputation, and good character for the evidence to be at least considered for my bullying charge investigation. Instead I've been treated with no respect or appreciation, when its B Hotels Ltd who've not saved copies of the CCTV evidence, believed an infeasible witness statement and the perpetrator for not knowing anything about the incident despite it being on CCTV!
Furthermore, they've not believed a word that I've said, and every word that do-called heterosexuals have said about this incident and others, and so have treated me unequally due to my sexuality; besides myself having morals!
5. To ensure my reasons weren't data protected, like that of Mrs L L, has Mrs K equated my camp satirical conclusion about Mr T, to having the same impact on him as myself being sexually abused as a child?
As I told Mrs K that I was raped as a child, besides being beaten up as an adult for being gay by people who showed similar characteristics to Mr T, yet she's devoted most of her summary in dismissing me by focusing on, 'I was abused, so why abuse Mr T!
This has not only disgusted me, it has triggered all the negative emotions I've had in the past about it.
It's also homophobic as I told her my sexuality is due to issues stemming from childhood sexual abuse (attractions to essences of people who I found comfort from at the time to cope with my trauma - 'psychosexuality'), and is therefore gaslighting the facts to ensure I'm dismissed so that I can't hold management at The Hotel accountable for their actions anymore!!
Are there any preliminary issues which should be decided before the final hearing?
If yes, what preliminary issues?
Yes, I've reported Mr T to the police for having what advertisers itself as an indecent underage app in his 'likes' on Facebook, and Mr J for denying the incident even took place, despite myself doing a police report with the police for two hours whilst he operated the CCTV for them!!
The police have interviewed Mr T, but have yet to respond to the information about Mr J •
How many witnesses will each party call? Who are those witnesses? Why are they needed?
10
Mr J, P C B, P C H, Mr A, Mr S, Mr T, Mrs G, Mrs K Ms S S and Mrs L J.
1. Mr J has denied the police attended the incident at the hotel, and thus, what he told them!!!
He has also said the teenagers weren't barred by other management, he also claims to have barred them for the final incident when he wasn't even present, besides questioning why I didn't tell him the boy had threatened to slice me up when its written in the reports and saw it on CCTV!
So he needs to explain to the judge about why he has lied about everything!!
2. & 3. P C B and P C H are needed to either confirm Mr J's lies about him witnessing the incident, myself being responsible for it, and the police not attending it etc; or to reopen the case following this new evidence he's given in response to the grievance I put in against him. I would also like to ask the officers if they remember how Mr J knew the boys full name, as he told everyone present he "unbarred the boy after meeting with his mother, as they lived out of town and needed somewhere to stay after school until she could pick them up"!
4. The Owner of The Hotel is needed to see if he knows of the boy or indeed the couple; after the boy said, "He knew the owner, and he was allowed here". He does have a connection to the town, so maybe he's a relative or friends relative, and so this huge cover up could be just to save his embarrassment. As Mr J confirmed to police that he had met the boy's mother, and unbarred him; yet now he's not only denied this, but also the police being involved at all!
Therefore he could either vouch for Mr J's possible reason for covering this saga up, or still leave the reasons for it open.
5. The Area's Manger will have been responsible for moving Mr J on to work in other hotels later that summer, so it will be interesting to see why he got moved at such a time after spending around 6 years at The Hotel.
6. Mr T had his homophobic regressive anger outburst (about me) whilst in conversation with Ms S S outside my office!!
Due to regressive anger sufferers having a high chance of not remembering their 'attacks' (as in this case?), their seems little point in asking him about it. But he can be asked to speculate what he thinks is most likely to have caused it;
a) myself wearing Xmas Reindeer Antlers,
b) my sexuality
c) Or myself trying to put an end to a girl from the age of 13 doing obscene things in the hotels disabled toilets; as Mr T has an obscene app entitled "13 year old girl doing obscene things in public" in his Facebook likes section!!
7. Mrs LJ is the only person to have confirmed viewing any CCTV footage, so I would like her to reveal what she saw, and to bring along any saved footage to the tribunal.
8. First of all Mrs G needs to be asked if she viewed the CCTV of the Mr T incident, as she said she would investigate it after the investigative hearing with her, but I've not seen or heard of any feedback from that. Neither have I heard anything back about any further investigation into her Banqueting manager claim that he 'doesn't employ homosexuals as they are nothing but trouble'.
Mrs G can also be asked what gives her the confidence to believe Mr J didn't unbar the children when he's told the police he had!!!
Is this the same reasoning of believing so-called Heterosexuals like Mr T without question, and not so-called 'Pansexuals' like myself?
Likewise she can account for saying she 'wouldn't go through it with me', and then say, "I haven't told her about being threatened" - threats that are in the incident book, police reports and were witnessed by the temporary manager (who is not available due to being out of the country!) and viewed by Mr J and the police on CCTV.
She can also account for why she didn't discipline me, and had nothing to say about the first post I sent. Though she found time to write a memo, and sneer at me as she asked me to sign something that basically said don't inform people publicly about what management are both facilitating and condoning!
Mrs G can also account for allegedly telling me 'I've no need to get involved', when I'm the one who kept on getting called to deal with these situations!!
Therefore what was the plan (if any) for dealing with these incidents that went on for at least two years, as it was discussed in Morning, and H.O.D. meetings several times.
Moreover, why was I not informed of whatever plan Mr J had (besides condoning it, facilitating it, denying everything and blaming me for it) to stop, and deal with the obscene behaviour and threats.
She can also be asked about her attitude to young girls who've been bullied, and her suitability to be in the role she is in!
9. Mrs K can be asked why she didn't interview any of the witnesses (File 2) that would have proven that everything I wrote about was true, and so I wouldn't of been found guilty of bringing the company into disrepute. She can also be asked why she thinks the act of raping as a child, is akin to what most people have called 'hilarious and brilliant satire'; that's done its job by getting someone with obscene paedophilic and homophobic issues on the path towards getting therapy, and thus keeping people safe from him too.
10. Ms S S has given exactly the same version of events as me except for the location, and says he called me 'that way inclined' and didn't shout "cos I'm F###ing Bent", in response to me wearing Xmas reindeer antlers.
Mr T doesn't remember anything about this neither, whilst Ms S refused to speak to the police about the incident which she now says of it "It's happened, but wasn't as bad as you're making out.".
Hence, she can explain why she has changed the location and specific details about the incident her departmental manager is solely responsible for!!
Comments
Post a Comment